Skip to content

Conversation

@yuandrew
Copy link
Contributor

@yuandrew yuandrew commented Jan 29, 2026

What changed?
Added activity_ prefix to id_reuse_policy and id_conflict_policy

Why?
to match the existing workflow_id_reuse_policy and workflow_id_conflict_policy

Breaking changes
Breaking change for a feature not yet released

Server PR
temporalio/temporal#9170

Copy link
Member

@bergundy bergundy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is going to be painful to change because it breaks compilation of the SDK. I would be fine with the change but don't think it's necessarily worth it.

Copy link
Member

@cretz cretz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only approved if we can make sure no SDK merges its implementation of standalone activities yet with a reference to the formerly named field

@yuandrew
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ehh, scrapping this effort, not worth the effort to coordinate the change across server/SDKs.. we can live with it

@yuandrew yuandrew closed this Jan 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants